Bank Deposit Protection Rules for Businesses

In December 2010, new limits were announced for the levels of protection available for different investments underwritten by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).

The FSCS protects the deposits of small companies, which are those which meet two of three criteria:

  • they have fewer than 50 employees;
  • their turnover is not more than £6.5 million per year; and
  • the balance sheet total is less than £3.26 million.

The £85,000 limit is also available for unincorporated organisations, partnerships and sole traders, but in the latter case the limit would apply in total to all (i.e. business and personal) accounts held by the customer with the same lender.

One possible area for concern is whether deposits held in different members of the same banking group are covered separately. In this case, if each of the banks is separately authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, the FSCS would pay compensation up to the limit of £85,000 per person (from 31 December 2010, the limit is being raised to the sterling equivalent of €100,000), per authorised institution. If each of the banks is not separately authorised but is covered by the parent company's authorisation, the FSCS would pay compensation up to the limit of £85,000 once, irrespective of how many different group members a person held accounts with.

In July 2009, it was announced that the scheme was being improved for those with deposits at and loans from the same bank. These will now be 'netted off' for the purposes of compensation, which will improve the position for some customers.

Deposit takers in the Channel Islands and Isle of Man are not covered by the scheme.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Search this site

Ask a free legal question

Complete this simple form if you
would like to ask us a
free legal question

Ask Us A Free Legal Question

What Our Clients Say

We would like to thank you for the superb work and attention to detail that has gone into our dispute with the council so far! 

Our Architect put together a very professional document which was further enhanced and polished by your very professional input. 

You are in fact unique in my personal experience of the legal profession in that you take your duty of care very seriously. It is obvious that the outcome concerns you greatly and your determination to win is much appreciated!

Thank you from us both. 

Best Regards
 
Mr and Mrs X, Surrey

Latest News

Price Info Swap Anti-Competitive Price Info Swap Anti-Competitive
Negligence Limited Where Contractual Requirements Met Negligence Limited Where Contractual Requirements Met
Should I Take On a Franchise? Should I Take On a Franchise?
Owner Not the Same as Member, Rules Court Owner Not the Same as Member, Rules Court
Supply of Goods and Services Act Does Not Cover Professional Negligence Supply of Goods and Services Act Does Not Cover Professional Negligence
Realism Essential in Damages Claims Realism Essential in Damages Claims
Ignoring Contract Implications Spells Trouble Ignoring Contract Implications Spells Trouble
Data Protection Fine Shows Need for Care Data Protection Fine Shows Need for Care
Insurers Fail in Attempt to Limit Theft Claim Insurers Fail in Attempt to Limit Theft Claim
Revised Targets on Electronic Waste Revised Targets on Electronic Waste
New Guidance on Penalties for Competition Law Breaches New Guidance on Penalties for Competition Law Breaches
Disclosure of Anonymised Data Does Not Require Consent Disclosure of Anonymised Data Does Not Require Consent
Undeliverable Goods Claim Succeeds Despite Insurer's Arguments Undeliverable Goods Claim Succeeds Despite Insurer's Arguments
Company Collapse - HBOS Must Share Blame Company Collapse - HBOS Must Share Blame
How Much Better Are Best Endeavours Than Reasonable Endeavours? How Much Better Are Best Endeavours Than Reasonable Endeavours?
Directors' Remuneration - Announcement Directors' Remuneration - Announcement
Accountants Owed No Duty to Creditors After Corporate Collapse Accountants Owed No Duty to Creditors After Corporate Collapse
Competition Changes - Cartel Arrangements Competition Changes - Cartel Arrangements
Supreme Court Clarifies Liability for Injury Supreme Court Clarifies Liability for Injury
ECJ Rules on 'Below Cost' Selling ECJ Rules on 'Below Cost' Selling
Claims Firms Cannot Claim Legal Privilege Claims Firms Cannot Claim Legal Privilege
Bank Cleared of Liability for Losses Due to Reasonable Suspicion Bank Cleared of Liability for Losses Due to Reasonable Suspicion
Consultation on Private Sector Challenges to Competition Law Consultation on Private Sector Challenges to Competition Law
Directors' Pay - Accountability Directors' Pay - Accountability
Fraud and the Director Fraud and the Director