Copyright Clarifications

When copyright is licensed, use of the copyright material is limited to that contemplated by the parties at the time the licence is created.

This decision of the Court of Appeal has implications for many users of licensed material. The case arose when a freelance photographer took exception to photographs he had taken being held in a national newspaper’s photo archive. He had supplied the photographs when he carried out an assignment for the newspaper group, but claimed that use of the pictures should be limited even though the newspaper owned copyright of the original compilation of material which included the photographs.

In another case, users of media monitoring services were ruled to have infringed the copyright of publishers when they received material from the services but did not have an end-user licence. The monitoring services themselves had the relevant licences, but their customers did not.

The case also clarified the point that both headlines and short text extracts were also copyright.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Ask a free legal question

Complete this simple form if you
would like to ask us a
free legal question
 

What Our Clients Say

We would like to thank you for the superb work and attention to detail that has gone into our dispute with the council so far! 

Our Architect put together a very professional document which was further enhanced and polished by your very professional input. 

You are in fact unique in my personal experience of the legal profession in that you take your duty of care very seriously. It is obvious that the outcome concerns you greatly and your determination to win is much appreciated!

Thank you from us both. 

Best Regards
 
Mr and Mrs X, Surrey