Correct Procedure Means No Human Rights Act Claim

Social Housing providers will greet a recent decision of the Supreme Court with relief.

The Court upheld a local council’s decision that it had discharged its duty to secure accommodation for persons who were homeless by sending each of them a letter offering accommodation and then closing its file when the letters received no response.

The persons involved denied receiving the letters of offer and argued that they had been denied their right to ‘a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law’ under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA).

The Court could not agree that the HRA was engaged by the decision and dismissed the appeal.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Ask a free legal question

Complete this simple form if you
would like to ask us a
free legal question
 

What Our Clients Say

We would like to thank you for the superb work and attention to detail that has gone into our dispute with the council so far! 

Our Architect put together a very professional document which was further enhanced and polished by your very professional input. 

You are in fact unique in my personal experience of the legal profession in that you take your duty of care very seriously. It is obvious that the outcome concerns you greatly and your determination to win is much appreciated!

Thank you from us both. 

Best Regards
 
Mr and Mrs X, Surrey