Joint Account Does Not Mean Joint Ownership

Having money in an account held in two or more names does not mean that the account is held jointly by all those named and that entitlement to the total balance automatically passes to the last survivor.

A recent case dealt with a bank account that was held in two names. A mother, aged 78, opened the account and the funds were held in her name and in the name of one of her sons. She paid in all the money.

The woman died shortly thereafter and her executors called on her son to account to his late mother’s estate for the sums he had withdrawn from the account and the balance on the account when she died.

He argued that he had inherited the balance by survivorship and was entitled to retain the sums he had withdrawn.

The court ruled that the balance in the account when she died was an estate asset. The son was entitled to retain any withdrawals he had made under her authority, but any other withdrawals had to be refunded to the estate.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Ask a free legal question

Complete this simple form if you
would like to ask us a
free legal question
 

What Our Clients Say

We would like to thank you for the superb work and attention to detail that has gone into our dispute with the council so far! 

Our Architect put together a very professional document which was further enhanced and polished by your very professional input. 

You are in fact unique in my personal experience of the legal profession in that you take your duty of care very seriously. It is obvious that the outcome concerns you greatly and your determination to win is much appreciated!

Thank you from us both. 

Best Regards
 
Mr and Mrs X, Surrey