Nuisance Covenant Stops Extension

It is normal for properties to contain covenants of different sorts and one which is common in residential estates is a covenant not to do anything which causes a nuisance to nearby property owners.

The Court of Appeal recently had to consider whether such a covenant would stop the building of an extension to a property on a residential estate. The property was subject to covenants not to erect any building which was not in accordance with plans approved by the estate’s management company and also do anything which might ‘be or become a nuisance’ to the other estate dwellers.

The man planned to build a three-storey extension to his house which would impede the views of the river Thames enjoyed by other residents. He argued that the restriction in the covenant applied to use of the plot (the relevant clause in the covenant included restrictions on use) and not to the erection of annoying buildings.

The Court disagreed, holding that the more general wording in the covenant was wide enough to include the erection of an annoying building.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Ask a free legal question

Complete this simple form if you
would like to ask us a
free legal question
 

What Our Clients Say

We would like to thank you for the superb work and attention to detail that has gone into our dispute with the council so far! 

Our Architect put together a very professional document which was further enhanced and polished by your very professional input. 

You are in fact unique in my personal experience of the legal profession in that you take your duty of care very seriously. It is obvious that the outcome concerns you greatly and your determination to win is much appreciated!

Thank you from us both. 

Best Regards
 
Mr and Mrs X, Surrey