Construction Industry Price-Fixers Hit with £100 Million in Fines

The main type of collusion between firms was the practice of ‘cover pricing’ where tenders are submitted at artificially high prices by firms who do not want to win them, enabling the firm that does to submit a higher tender bid than they would be willing to accept for the contract on offer. Sometimes the ‘unsuccessful’ bidders are compensated by the ‘winner’ by the making of a payment.

The fines are an indication of the seriousness with which the OFT takes such matters. The UK has strict anti-competition laws and can fine businesses that transgress them up to 10 per cent of turnover – a potentially cataclysmic sum. In this case the average fine represents just more than one per cent of the firm’s annual worldwide turnover.

Link: OFT Press release.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Ask a free legal question

Complete this simple form if you
would like to ask us a
free legal question
 

What Our Clients Say

We would like to thank you for the superb work and attention to detail that has gone into our dispute with the council so far! 

Our Architect put together a very professional document which was further enhanced and polished by your very professional input. 

You are in fact unique in my personal experience of the legal profession in that you take your duty of care very seriously. It is obvious that the outcome concerns you greatly and your determination to win is much appreciated!

Thank you from us both. 

Best Regards
 
Mr and Mrs X, Surrey